Portions of some files released from the Justice Department’s investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender, were not properly redacted digitally, with some censored information easily revealed by copying and pasting blacked-out text into a separate file.
The information from the failed redactions surfaced by The New York Times shed no additional light on the well-documented ties between President Trump and Mr. Epstein.
But it showed more examples of how Mr. Epstein carried out his abuse and concealed his money through financial and corporate structures, and the ease of recovering the material suggested that at least a few materials in the trove of documents released by the Justice Department were hastily censored.
One such failed redaction occurred in a civil suit against the executors of Mr. Epstein’s estate, filed in the Virgin Islands in 2021. According to the redacted portion of the civil suit, revealed through copying and pasting into another document, one of the executors, Darren K. Indyke, signed a check from Mr. Epstein’s foundation to an immigration lawyer who was “involved in one or more forced marriages arranged among Epstein’s victims.”
Chad Gilmartin, a spokesman for the Justice Department, said the failed redactions had been applied by parties in the civil litigation. The Justice Department, Mr. Gilmartin said, “simply reproduced the materials,” which were collected to be part of the Epstein files.
The Guardian reported earlier on some of the documents’ redactions’ being undone.
President Trump last month signed into law a bill promising the release of all files related to the Epstein investigation, as well as transparency around their release. The bill said that no documents could be redacted on the basis of “embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity.” It granted exceptions for redactions in a number of situations, including where victims’ personal information could be compromised.
“The only redactions being applied to the documents are those required by law — full stop,” Todd Blanche, the deputy attorney general, said in a statement last week.
-
Document Hinted at Further Prosecutions: The 2020 email laid out the criminal charges and investigative steps that prosecutors were mulling at the time.
-
Pro-Trump Influencers Quiet about Epstein Files: Their silence after a batch of materials containing hundreds of mentions of President Trump was released contrasted with the uproar made when the Justice Department’s first release focused on former President Bill Clinton. The DOJ initially removed, then restored, a photograph that included an image of Trump.
-
Prince Andrew: In emails sent to Ghislaine Maxwell, a man at the British royal family’s summer residence in Scotland asks her for “new inappropriate friends,” then inquires about “girls” ahead of a trip to Peru.
-
Wall Street Figures: Jeffrey Epstein named a rotating cast of top Wall Street executives, as well as former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, to serve as executors of his estate, according to released copies of his last will and testament.
-
Redacted Material in Epstein Investigation: The ease of recovering information that was not properly redacted digitally suggests that at least some of the documents released by the Justice Department were hastily censored.
-
Letter From Victims: More than a dozen women who have said they were victims of Epstein called on Congress to hold hearings to ensure that the Justice Department is fully complying with the terms of the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
